If you take the total environmental cost of a vehicle as the point  from when the car was first designed to when it is dismantled, or  hopefully recycled, hybrid vehicles don’t quite match the hype they are  currently getting. 
A hybrid is a complicated vehicle, requiring lots of new technology  and high tech components. A hybrid vehicle is harder to build because of  its complexity, which means more energy is used in building the car.  Some hybrids can charge their batteries from mains power, and this could  be generated by ‘dirty’ technologies such as coal fired power stations  or nuclear power. This is especially true for the pure electric cars on  the market – it depends on how the electricity is produced as to what  end effect your car is having on the environment.
While hybrids are considered clean technology by most people, any  hybrid with an internal combustion engine will still produce pollutants.  Catalytic converters handle most of the contamination, but there’s  still that good old greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide. Even hybrids pump  this out, they just pump lower amounts of it, and mostly because most  hybrids have engines that stop when the vehicle comes to a halt.
Another thing to consider with hybrids is the battery that stores the  electricity. Most hybrids use a nickel metal hydride system, which  requires nickel mining, which is often done in open cast mines with all  the attendant pollution that goes along with excavating large holes in  the ground. Luckily, nickel metal hydride batteries are non toxic and  they can be recycled, but at a cost.
A hybrid also requires plenty of copper wire for the electric motors,  further increasing the actual cost and environmental effect of  constructing the car. Hybrids are also commonly 10 percent heavier than a  similarly sized car, which means more power has to be produced than  usual to achieve comparable performance. This is why many hybrids these  days are actually mild hybrids, with a generator that produces  electricity as the vehicle slows down, taking weight off the alternator,  allowing it to work less, and therefore save fuel. Not as much as a  hybrid, but the system is much simpler and easier to produce.
Once the car is built and on the road, the popular perception is that  you are ‘doing your thing for the environment’ and this is true to some  extent because a hybrid will use less fossil fuel than a conventional  car, regardless of the way you drive it. Remember that a hybrid will  probably never match the listed fuel efficiency because of the way the  efficiency test is done, and because unless you only ever drive on  heavily congested streets you won’t be utilizing the hybrid system  effectively. Drive on the highway, for instance, and the petrol engine  will be working all the time, negating the effect of the hybrid system.
Above all, remember you are not saving the planet by driving a hybrid  or even a fully electric car, you are merely minimizing your impact on  the environment.

 
I had hear that stuff! and i think this is the reason why our company houston used cars is not borrowing these care on regular intervals
ReplyDelete